The Demand for ‘Fair’ Outcomes: An Experimental Study of Payoff Maximization, Social Efficiency, Fairness, Gender, and Personality Type

  • John Cadigan Gettysburg College
  • Pamela Schmitt United States Naval Academy, Department of Economics
  • Kurtis Swope United States Naval Academy, Department of Economics

Abstract

 


We use a modified dictator experiment to examine subjects’ willingness to pay for a ‘fair’ outcome and how this is influenced by social efficiency.  We find that subjects exhibit a downward-sloping demand for the fair outcome that increases when the fair outcome is socially efficient and decreases with the experimental stakes.  Because a subject’s relative emphasis on payoff maximization, fairness and social efficiency may likely be related to personality type, we add controls for personality preferences as measured by the Myers Briggs Type Indicator (MBTI).  This also allows for a more precise examination of gender effects.  We find that personality preferences are important determinants of decision making.  Controlling for personality preferences, we find that women are more likely to choose the fair outcome then men.  This effect is particularly strong when the unequal payoff outcome favors the (passive) responder.   

Published
2019-02-15
How to Cite
CADIGAN, John; SCHMITT, Pamela; SWOPE, Kurtis. The Demand for ‘Fair’ Outcomes: An Experimental Study of Payoff Maximization, Social Efficiency, Fairness, Gender, and Personality Type. Archives of Psychology, [S.l.], v. 3, n. 1, feb. 2019. ISSN 2573-7902. Available at: <https://archivesofpsychology.org/index.php/aop/article/view/89>. Date accessed: 22 mar. 2019. doi: https://doi.org/10.31296/aop.v3i1.89.

Most read articles by the same author(s)

Obs.: This plugin requires at least one statistics/report plugin to be enabled. If your statistics plugins provide more than one metric then please also select a main metric on the admin's site settings page and/or on the journal manager's settings pages.