The Elusive Concept of Expertise: Who Counts as an Expert?

  • Barbara Gail Montero City University of New York

Abstract

There is an ongoing debate in the philosophy and psychology of skill as to the nature of expertise. On the one side of this debate are those who maintain that although novices need to think about, deliberate over, and pay attention to their developing skills, experts perform optimally in the absence of conscious skill-directed attention, while on the other side, are those who maintain that experts generally are consciously engaged in their execution of their skills. What, exactly, do the various proponents of each side of this debate mean by “expert” when they claim that experts either do or do not consciously attend to their movements in action? The aim of this paper is to describe and critically analyze some of the uses of the term “expert” in the expertise literature, along with the criteria that have been employed to identify experts and, ultimately, to suggest a conceptualization of expertise that may facilitate a more productive debate over the question of whether experts think in action.

Author Biography

Barbara Gail Montero, City University of New York

City University of New York

Published
2018-05-15
How to Cite
MONTERO, Barbara Gail. The Elusive Concept of Expertise: Who Counts as an Expert?. Archives of Psychology, [S.l.], v. 2, n. 5, may 2018. ISSN 2573-7902. Available at: <https://archivesofpsychology.org/index.php/aop/article/view/55>. Date accessed: 14 aug. 2018. doi: https://doi.org/10.31296/aop.v2i5.55.
Section
Research Articles

Most read articles by the same author(s)

Obs.: This plugin requires at least one statistics/report plugin to be enabled. If your statistics plugins provide more than one metric then please also select a main metric on the admin's site settings page and/or on the journal manager's settings pages.